Screener
ACSG vs XDSQ
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF – Quarterly
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.30% less per year.
- XDSQ is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSG is classified as equity, while XDSQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ACSG follows a active selection strategy; XDSQ uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | XDSQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $71M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.87 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.68% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -26.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and XDSQ
Explore further