Screener
XDSQ vs FDG
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF – Quarterly vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.34% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than XDSQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XDSQ is classified as alternative, while FDG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- XDSQ follows a structured outcome strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XDSQ | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $387M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.5% | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.8% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.68% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -26.06% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XDSQ and FDG
Explore further