Screener
ACSV vs BASG
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.12% less per year.
- BASG is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSV covers north america markets; BASG covers global.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | BASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $467M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -19.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and BASG
Explore further