Screener
ACSV vs FLV
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FLV costs 0.07% less per year.
- FLV is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | FLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.42% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $347M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.09% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -15.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and FLV
Explore further