Screener
ACSV vs VALQ
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs American Century U.S. Quality Value ETF
Key differences
- VALQ costs 0.20% less per year.
- VALQ is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSV follows a active selection strategy; VALQ uses index tracking.
- VALQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | VALQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $306M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.27% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -38.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and VALQ
Explore further