Screener
ACSV vs FNDX
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDX costs 0.24% less per year.
- FNDX is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSV follows a active selection strategy; FNDX uses index tracking.
- FNDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $25.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.39% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -37.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and FNDX
Explore further