Screener
ACSV vs FYC
American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF vs First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- ACSV costs 0.21% less per year.
- FYC is significantly larger than ACSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSV follows a active selection strategy; FYC uses index tracking.
- FYC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSV | FYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +56.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -7.39% | -47.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSV and FYC
Explore further