Screener
ACVF vs ACSG
American Conservative Values ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.26% less per year.
- ACVF is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACVF | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $146M | $15M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.39% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACVF and ACSG
Explore further