Screener
ACVF vs FDG
American Conservative Values ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.30% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACVF | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $146M | $387M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.8% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.46% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -24.39% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACVF and FDG
Explore further