Screener
ACWV vs EELV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- ACWV costs 0.09% less per year.
- ACWV is significantly larger than EELV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWV covers global markets; EELV covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EELV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWV | EELV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $442M |
| Since | 2011 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 3.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +11.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.75% | 10.81% |
| Max drawdown | -28.82% | -36.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWV and EELV
Explore further