Screener
ACWV vs USMV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Key differences
- USMV costs 0.05% less per year.
- USMV is significantly larger than ACWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWV covers global markets; USMV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, USMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWV | USMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $22.9B |
| Since | 2011 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 1.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.75% | 8.57% |
| Max drawdown | -28.82% | -33.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWV and USMV
Explore further