Screener
ACWV vs VFMV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF ETF Shares
Key differences
- VFMV costs 0.07% less per year.
- ACWV is significantly larger than VFMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWV covers global markets; VFMV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, VFMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWV | VFMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $421M |
| Since | 2011 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 1.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +15.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.75% | 8.86% |
| Max drawdown | -28.82% | -33.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWV and VFMV
Explore further