Screener
ACWV vs VSMV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF vs VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
Key differences
- ACWV costs 0.15% less per year.
- ACWV is significantly larger than VSMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWV covers global markets; VSMV covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, VSMV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWV | VSMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.3B | $153M |
| Since | 2011 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.05% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.9% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.75% | 9.20% |
| Max drawdown | -28.82% | -31.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWV and VSMV
Explore further