Screener
ACWX vs IWB
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than ACWX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWX covers global ex us markets; IWB covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWX | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $46.2B |
| Since | 2008 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.3% | +29.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.9% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.1% | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.53% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -35.35% | -34.60% |
Similar to ACWX and IWB
Explore further