Screener
IWB vs ACWI
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.17% less per year.
- IWB covers north america markets; ACWI covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $31.3B |
| Since | 2000 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +31.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.5% | +11.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 12.88% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -33.53% |
Similar to IWB and ACWI
Explore further