Screener
ADIV vs GMF
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Key differences
- GMF costs 0.29% less per year.
- GMF is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV is classified as equity, while GMF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; GMF uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $386M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -40.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and GMF
Explore further