Screener
ADIV vs IPAC
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.69% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2006 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and IPAC
Explore further