Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ADIV vs KONG

Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF

ADIV

Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF

Annual cost

0.78%

Fund size

$56M

KONG

Formidable Fortress ETF

Annual cost

0.89%

Fund size

$22M

Key differences

ADIV is an equity ETF, while KONG is an alternative ETF. ADIV charges 0.78% a year and KONG 0.89%.

  • ADIV is an equity fund, while KONG is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ADIV follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
  • ADIV costs 0.11% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, ADIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ADIVKONG
Annual cost (TER)0.78%0.89%
Fund size (AUM)$56M$22M
Since20062021
Dividend yield2.69%0.36%
Asset classequityalternative
Region
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+14.1%+6.3%
CAGR 3Y+17.3%+9.8%
CAGR 5Y+5.8%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.850.53
Volatility 1Y13.84%10.91%
Max drawdown-31.55%-19.98%

Similar to ADIV and KONG