Screener
ADIV vs DIVS
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Dividend Builder ETF
Key differences
- DIVS costs 0.33% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, ADIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $39M |
| Since | 2006 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 1.75% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +11.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 10.54% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -29.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and DIVS
Explore further