Screener
ADIV vs SDY
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF
Key differences
- SDY costs 0.43% less per year.
- SDY is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; SDY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ADIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | SDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $22.0B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 2.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +10.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 10.48% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -36.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and SDY
Explore further