Screener
ADIV vs WDIV
Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
Key differences
- WDIV costs 0.38% less per year.
- WDIV is significantly larger than ADIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADIV follows a active selection strategy; WDIV uses index tracking.
- ADIV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADIV | WDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.78% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $266M |
| Since | 2006 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 2.78% | 4.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.2% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.1% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 10.17% |
| Max drawdown | -31.55% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADIV and WDIV
Explore further