Screener
AFLG vs KONG
First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- AFLG costs 0.34% less per year.
- AFLG is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFLG is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AFLG follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, AFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFLG | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $609M | $22M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.73% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.2% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.3% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.60% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -35.84% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFLG and KONG
Explore further