Screener
AFMC vs FSGS
First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF vs First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF
Key differences
Both AFMC and FSGS are equity ETFs. AFMC charges 0.68% a year and FSGS 0.61%. The main difference: AFMC follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- AFMC follows a active selection strategy; FSGS uses index tracking.
- FSGS costs 0.07% less per year.
- AFMC is much larger than FSGS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFMC | FSGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $29M |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.79% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.95 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.06% | 15.27% |
| Max drawdown | -42.14% | -43.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.