Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FSGS vs FTGS

First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF vs First Trust Growth Strength ETF

FSGS

First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF

First Trust

Annual cost

0.61%

Fund size

$29M

FTGS

First Trust Growth Strength ETF

First Trust

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.2B

Key differences

  • FTGS is significantly larger than FSGS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, FTGS has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FSGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

FSGSFTGS
Annual cost (TER)0.61%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$29M$1.2B
Since20172022
Dividend yield0.00%0.09%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+6.0%+12.9%
CAGR 3Y+8.3%+19.9%
CAGR 5Y+2.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.330.97
Volatility 1Y15.30%13.50%
Max drawdown-43.25%-19.99%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to FSGS and FTGS