Screener
AFSM vs FLQS
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF vs Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Key differences
- FLQS costs 0.40% less per year.
- AFSM follows a active selection strategy; FLQS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AFSM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFSM | FLQS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $94M | $51M |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 1.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +12.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.53 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.84% | 15.31% |
| Max drawdown | -43.54% | -42.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFSM and FLQS
Explore further