Screener
FLQS vs AFMC
Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- FLQS costs 0.33% less per year.
- AFMC is significantly larger than FLQS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FLQS follows a index tracking strategy; AFMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FLQS | AFMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $153M |
| Since | 2017 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.34% | 0.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.1% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.3% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.31% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -42.16% | -42.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FLQS and AFMC
Explore further