Screener
AFSM vs FLRG
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF vs Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- FLRG costs 0.60% less per year.
- FLRG is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFSM follows a active selection strategy; FLRG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFSM | FLRG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $94M | $283M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.84% | 10.28% |
| Max drawdown | -43.54% | -19.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFSM and FLRG
Explore further