Screener
AFSM vs PSC
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF vs Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.37% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFSM follows a active selection strategy; PSC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFSM | PSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $94M | $2.0B |
| Since | 2019 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.0% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +18.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.9% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.78 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.84% | 18.83% |
| Max drawdown | -43.54% | -46.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFSM and PSC
Explore further