Screener
PSC vs AFLG
Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF vs First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF
Key differences
- PSC costs 0.17% less per year.
- PSC is significantly larger than AFLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PSC follows a index tracking strategy; AFLG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AFLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSC | AFLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $609M |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.6% | +26.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.7% | +23.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.83% | 11.60% |
| Max drawdown | -46.75% | -35.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSC and AFLG
Explore further