Screener
AGGA vs BNDY
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF vs Horizon Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGGA costs 0.11% less per year.
- AGGA is classified as fixed income, while BNDY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AGGA follows a active selection strategy; BNDY uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGGA | BNDY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76M | $186M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.95% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.16% | — |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -3.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGGA and BNDY
Explore further