Screener
AGGA vs HCRB
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF vs Hartford Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- HCRB costs 0.26% less per year.
- HCRB is significantly larger than AGGA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGGA follows a active selection strategy; HCRB uses index tracking.
- HCRB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGGA | HCRB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76M | $360M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.95% | 4.18% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.16% | 3.86% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -19.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGGA and HCRB
Explore further