Screener
AGNG vs IYH
Global X Aging Population ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IYH costs 0.12% less per year.
- IYH is significantly larger than AGNG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AGNG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGNG | IYH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2016 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.52% | 14.63% |
| Max drawdown | -30.58% | -28.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGNG and IYH
Explore further