Screener
AGNG vs IXJ
Global X Aging Population ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IXJ costs 0.10% less per year.
- IXJ is significantly larger than AGNG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AGNG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGNG | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2016 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +4.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.52% | 14.45% |
| Max drawdown | -30.58% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGNG and IXJ
Explore further