Screener
AGOX vs ASMF
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF vs Virtus AlphaSimplex Managed Futures ETF
Key differences
- ASMF costs 0.53% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than ASMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGOX follows a active selection strategy; ASMF uses managed futures.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGOX | ASMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.33% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $364M | $31M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.0% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.38% | 11.10% |
| Max drawdown | -27.72% | -15.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGOX and ASMF
Explore further