Screener
AGOX vs ASGM
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF vs Virtus Alphasimplex Global Macro Etf
Key differences
- ASGM costs 0.47% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than ASGM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGOX follows a active selection strategy; ASGM uses systematic alpha.
- AGOX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGOX | ASGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.33% | 0.86% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $364M | $8M |
| Since | 2012 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.38% | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.72% | -6.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGOX and ASGM
Explore further