Screener
AGOX vs XNAV
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- XNAV costs 0.06% less per year.
- AGOX is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGOX | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.33% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $364M | $31M |
| Since | 2012 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.0% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.78 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.38% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -27.72% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGOX and XNAV
Explore further