Screener
XNAV vs XCOR
FundX Aggressive ETF vs Fundx ETF
Key differences
- XCOR costs 0.12% less per year.
- XCOR is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- XNAV is classified as alternative, while XCOR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| XNAV | XCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.27% | 1.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $180M |
| Since | 2002 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 0.41% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.8% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.40% | 12.85% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -22.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to XNAV and XCOR
Explore further