Screener
AGZ vs ICSH
iShares Agency Bond ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.12% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than AGZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGZ follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ICSH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGZ | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $552M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.61% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -11.01% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGZ and ICSH
Explore further