Screener
AGZ vs SHV
iShares Agency Bond ETF vs iShares 0–1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- SHV costs 0.05% less per year.
- SHV is significantly larger than AGZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGZ | SHV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $552M | $20.6B |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | 4.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.61% | 0.21% |
| Max drawdown | -11.01% | -0.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGZ and SHV
Explore further