Screener
AGZD vs NTSI
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund vs WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- NTSI is significantly larger than AGZD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGZD is classified as fixed income, while NTSI is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- AGZD covers north america markets; NTSI covers global.
- AGZD follows a index tracking strategy; NTSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, NTSI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGZD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGZD | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $92M | $486M |
| Since | 2013 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.02% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.13% | 15.02% |
| Max drawdown | -8.46% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGZD and NTSI
Explore further