Screener
AGZD vs NTSX
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund vs WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
Key differences
- NTSX is significantly larger than AGZD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGZD is classified as fixed income, while NTSX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- AGZD follows a index tracking strategy; NTSX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, NTSX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGZD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGZD | NTSX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $92M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.02% | 1.12% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.3% | +19.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.3% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.13% | 12.52% |
| Max drawdown | -8.46% | -31.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGZD and NTSX
Explore further