Skip to content
Screener

AHLT vs BSR

American Beacon AHL Trend ETF vs Beacon Selective Risk ETF

AHLT

American Beacon AHL Trend ETF

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$139M

BSR

Beacon Selective Risk ETF

Annual cost

1.09%

Fund size

$37M

Key differences

Both AHLT and BSR are fixed income ETFs. AHLT charges 0.96% a year and BSR 1.09%. The main difference: AHLT follows a systematic alpha strategy; BSR uses active selection.

  • AHLT follows a systematic alpha strategy; BSR uses active selection.
  • AHLT costs 0.13% less per year.
  • AHLT is much larger than BSR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

AHLTBSR
Annual cost (TER)0.96%1.09%
Fund size (AUM)$139M$37M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.53%1.02%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth america
Strategysystematic alphaactive selection
CAGR 1Y+33.5%+11.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+7.8%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.32
Volatility 1Y17.43%8.78%
Max drawdown-20.18%-15.68%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AHLT and BSR