Skip to content
Screener

AHLT vs BTR

American Beacon AHL Trend ETF vs Beacon Tactical Risk ETF

AHLT

American Beacon AHL Trend ETF

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$139M

BTR

Beacon Tactical Risk ETF

Annual cost

1.08%

Fund size

$35M

Key differences

AHLT is a fixed income ETF, while BTR is a mixed asset ETF. AHLT charges 0.96% a year and BTR 1.08%.

  • AHLT is a fixed income fund, while BTR is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AHLT follows a systematic alpha strategy; BTR uses active selection.
  • AHLT costs 0.12% less per year.
  • AHLT is much larger than BTR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

AHLTBTR
Annual cost (TER)0.96%1.08%
Fund size (AUM)$139M$35M
Since20232023
Dividend yield1.53%1.19%
Asset classfixed incomemixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategysystematic alphaactive selection
CAGR 1Y+33.5%+18.8%
CAGR 3YN/A+4.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.14
Volatility 1Y17.43%9.95%
Max drawdown-20.18%-16.67%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AHLT and BTR