Screener
AIFD vs BOTZ
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- BOTZ costs 0.07% less per year.
- BOTZ is significantly larger than AIFD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIFD follows a active selection strategy; BOTZ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIFD | BOTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $3.4B |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.7% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.01% | 24.21% |
| Max drawdown | -33.20% | -55.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIFD and BOTZ
Explore further