Screener
AIMS vs PSCF
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.46% less per year.
- AIMS is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIMS follows a active selection strategy; PSCF uses index tracking.
- PSCF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIMS | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $25M |
| Since | 2026 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.56% |
| Max drawdown | -8.30% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIMS and PSCF
Explore further