Screener
AIMS vs RWJ
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWJ costs 0.36% less per year.
- RWJ is significantly larger than AIMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIMS follows a active selection strategy; RWJ uses index tracking.
- RWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIMS | RWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +37.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.64 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.60% |
| Max drawdown | -8.30% | -51.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIMS and RWJ
Explore further