Screener
ALTY vs PFFV
Global X Alternative Income ETF vs Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFFV costs 0.25% less per year.
- PFFV is significantly larger than ALTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ALTY is classified as alternative, while PFFV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- ALTY follows a option income strategy; PFFV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ALTY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ALTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ALTY | PFFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $302M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 7.29% | 8.13% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.6% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.8% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +2.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.81% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -51.47% | -18.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ALTY and PFFV
Explore further