Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AMAX vs ACIO

Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF

AMAX

Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF

Adaptive ETF

Annual cost

1.36%

Fund size

$60M

ACIO

Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF

APTUS ETFs

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2.3B

Key differences

  • ACIO costs 0.57% less per year.
  • ACIO is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AMAX is classified as alternative, while ACIO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • AMAX follows a option income strategy; ACIO uses active selection.
  • Over the last 3 years, ACIO has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AMAXACIO
Annual cost (TER)1.36%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$60M$2.3B
Since20092019
Dividend yield10.63%0.39%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+11.8%+17.0%
CAGR 3Y+9.4%+16.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+10.4%
Sharpe 3Y0.591.20
Volatility 1Y9.98%8.40%
Max drawdown-16.25%-14.19%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AMAX and ACIO