Screener
AMAX vs CAM
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF
Key differences
- CAM costs 1.09% less per year.
- CAM is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX is classified as alternative, while CAM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; CAM uses active selection.
- CAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | CAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 1990 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -2.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and CAM
Explore further