Screener
AMAX vs FGSI
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Key differences
Both AMAX and FGSI are alternative ETFs. AMAX charges 1.36% a year and FGSI 0.85%. The main difference: FGSI costs 0.51% less per year.
- FGSI costs 0.51% less per year.
- AMAX is much larger than FGSI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | FGSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $3M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 10.96% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.31% | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -8.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.